Shape Your Academic Success with Expert Advice!

Open-Book Exam Strategy: What to Bring and How to Think for Success

December 13, 2025

9 min read

You’ve just heard your next exam is open-book, and that wave of relief washes over you. “This’ll be easy-I can just look everything up!” Right? Wrong. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: that false sense of security has derailed countless students who walked into open-book exams expecting a breeze and walked out wondering what hit them. The reality is that open-book exams aren’t easier-they’re just different, and they demand a completely different open-book exam strategy than you might expect.

Let’s cut through the misconceptions and build an approach that actually works.

Why Are Open-Book Exams Often Harder Than They Sound?

Here’s what catches most students off-guard: open-book exams test higher-order thinking skills that memorisation-based study won’t prepare you for. Whilst you’re frantically flipping through textbooks searching for specific facts, your exam questions are asking you to compare theoretical frameworks, evaluate competing arguments, or apply concepts to novel scenarios you’ve never seen before.

Research from medical and business programmes shows that 67% of students perform better on open-book exams-but only when they’ve prepared properly. The 33% who struggle? They’re typically the ones who relied on having materials available rather than deeply understanding them.

The cognitive demands are fundamentally different. Closed-book exams primarily assess recall and basic understanding. Open-book exams, however, target the top levels of Bloom’s taxonomy: analysing relationships between concepts, evaluating evidence quality, and creating original arguments. Your notes can provide supporting evidence, but they can’t think for you.

Think of it this way: in most professional settings, you’ll have access to resources when solving problems. Your boss isn’t testing whether you’ve memorised last quarter’s sales figures-they’re assessing whether you can interpret data, identify patterns, and recommend strategic decisions. Open-book exams mirror this real-world problem-solving where resources are accessible but understanding isn’t optional.

What Should You Actually Bring to an Open-Book Exam?

The materials you bring matter far less than how you’ve organised them. Let’s be strategic about this.

Essential materials to consider (after confirming what’s permitted):

  • Condensed summary sheets with key concepts and page references to longer explanations
  • Concept maps showing relationships between topics
  • Indexed textbooks with colour-coded tabs marking major sections
  • Formula sheets for quantitative subjects
  • Annotated lecture slides with your own clarifying notes in margins

What to absolutely avoid bringing:

  • Multiple versions of the same reference material (wastes time choosing which to use)
  • Disorganised, unmarked notes requiring lengthy searches
  • Excessive materials that clutter your workspace

Here’s a comparison of effective versus ineffective material preparation:

Effective ApproachIneffective ApproachImpact on Performance
Single condensed summary sheet with page referencesComplete set of unmarked lecture slidesQuick retrieval vs. endless scrolling
Colour-coded index tabs by topicTextbook with no markings30 seconds to find info vs. 5+ minutes
Concept map showing relationshipsRandom highlighted passagesUnderstanding connections vs. isolated facts
Annotated formula sheet with when to use eachList of formulas without contextKnow which to apply vs. trial and error
Digital folders with clear naming system (online exams)Desktop filled with randomly named filesInstant access vs. frantic searching

The students who score highest on open-book exams typically bring fewer materials but invest significantly more time organising them for rapid access. One study found that students preparing for open-book exams reviewed multiple sources and integrated information more deeply than those preparing for closed-book formats-but only when they understood the exam would test application rather than recall.

How Should You Think Differently for Open-Book Exams?

This is where your open-book exam strategy succeeds or fails. You cannot approach these exams thinking, “I’ll figure it out when I’m there with my materials.”

The critical mindset shift: Study as thoroughly as you would for a closed-book exam, but focus on understanding connections rather than memorising facts. Ask yourself:

  • How do these concepts relate to each other?
  • When would I apply Theory A versus Theory B?
  • What are the strengths and limitations of this approach?
  • How might this concept apply to different scenarios?

Research shows that students who anticipate higher-order thinking questions perform dramatically better. In one pharmacokinetics study, students scored 8.4% higher on quizzes and 6.8% higher on exams when properly prepared for open-book format—a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.61) that translates to several grade boundaries.

Practice answering questions that require you to:

  • Apply concepts to new situations
  • Analyse relationships between different theories
  • Evaluate the quality of evidence or arguments
  • Synthesise information from multiple sources into coherent responses
  • Compare and contrast different approaches or methodologies

Don’t memorise model answers. You won’t have time to search through pre-prepared responses, and questions rarely appear exactly as expected. Instead, develop flexible thinking patterns that allow you to construct original arguments using materials as supporting evidence.

What’s the Most Effective Way to Prepare Your Materials?

Your preparation strategy should create a quick-access system that doesn’t require conscious thought during the exam. Here’s the approach that consistently works:

Phase One: Study for Understanding (2-3 weeks before) Study all course material thoroughly—not to memorise it, but to understand how concepts interconnect. Research indicates this foundational understanding separates high performers from those who struggle. You’re building a mental framework that materials will supplement, not replace.

Phase Two: Create Condensed References (1 week before) Develop brief summaries of key concepts. These should be legible, organised by topic, and include page references to longer explanations. For instance, your summary might state: “Social Identity Theory—people derive self-concept from group membership (see textbook p. 247-251).” During the exam, you’ll recall the core concept and know exactly where to find supporting details.

Phase Three: Develop Your Indexing System (3-4 days before)

  • Use sticky notes to mark your textbook’s table of contents
  • Colour-code tabs for different themes (blue for theories, yellow for methods, green for case applications)
  • Write topic names on tabs extending beyond page edges for visibility
  • Create index cards listing major topics with corresponding page numbers
  • For digital materials, organise folders logically and test your ability to locate files quickly

Phase Four: Practice Under Timed Conditions (2-3 days before) Answer practice questions using your organised materials with a timer running. This reveals whether your system actually works under pressure. If you’re spending more than 30 seconds locating information, your organisation needs refinement.

77% of students report open-book exams cause less stress than closed-book formats—but this benefit only materialises when preparation is thorough. The students experiencing anxiety are typically those who’ve under-prepared, believing materials would compensate for lack of understanding.

How Do You Execute During the Exam Without Wasting Time?

Time management becomes absolutely critical in open-book exams. Here’s your execution strategy:

First 5 minutes: Survey the landscape Read all questions before answering any. This prevents tunnel vision and allows you to allocate time proportionally to marks available. If Question 3 is worth 40% of your grade, it deserves 40% of your time.

Next: Answer confident questions first Tackle questions you can answer largely from understanding, using materials only to verify specific facts or add supporting evidence. This builds momentum and secures marks whilst your mind is fresh.

Then: Address questions requiring more research For complex questions needing extensive material reference, use your organised system efficiently. You should be looking up specific formulas, definitions, or supporting quotations—not learning new information.

Critical principle: Don’t become absorbed searching through materials. Research from Cornell University’s Learning Strategies Center emphasises that excessive referencing wastes valuable time. If you can’t locate information within 30-45 seconds, move on and return if time permits.

When writing answers:

  • Read questions carefully, identifying key instruction words (analyse, evaluate, compare)
  • Structure responses properly (introduction outlining your argument, body with evidence, conclusion)
  • Paraphrase information from materials in your own words
  • Use direct quotations sparingly (3-4 words maximum, integrated into sentences)
  • Demonstrate your analysis rather than reproducing textbook content

Remember: you’re not transcribing your notes. You’re using them as evidence to support original arguments. One study of 396 psychology students found that 88% felt they learned more through open-book testing—but only when questions required genuine application of knowledge.

What Common Mistakes Should You Avoid?

These misconceptions derail students every semester:

Mistake 1: “I don’t need to study much because I have my materials” Wrong. Studies show that students who reduce study effort based on open-book format perform significantly worse. You must understand material thoroughly before the exam; there’s no time to learn it during.

Mistake 2: “More materials equal better performance” Actually, the opposite. Excessive materials create workspace clutter and decision paralysis. Students with streamlined, well-organised references consistently outperform those surrounded by mountains of paper.

Mistake 3: “I can copy directly from my textbook” This is plagiarism, even in open-book format. You must paraphrase information and, where required, cite sources using correct formatting (APA, Harvard, IEEE). Your analysis and conclusions must be original.

Mistake 4: “I should prepare model answers to expected questions” Pre-prepared answers rarely address what’s actually asked. Questions require flexible, adaptive thinking. Focus on understanding concepts deeply enough to apply them in various ways.

Mistake 5: “Open-book means easier, so I can relax” Research across multiple disciplines shows mixed results: business students often score higher with open-book formats, whilst engineering students showed better performance on closed-book exams in 2 of 3 courses when controlling for question content. The format doesn’t determine difficulty—question complexity does.

Making Open-Book Exams Work for You

Success in open-book exams comes down to recognising what they truly assess: your ability to think critically using available resources, not your capacity to memorise information. The format mirrors professional work environments where you’ll always have access to references but must demonstrate understanding, analysis, and original thinking.

Your open-book exam strategy should prioritise preparation for understanding, meticulous organisation of materials for rapid access, and disciplined time management during execution. Students who embrace this approach consistently report feeling more confident and performing better—with 82% of business students expressing preference for open-book testing when prepared appropriately.

The irony is that proper preparation for open-book exams often requires similar effort to closed-book formats, just directed differently. You’re building understanding and creating access systems rather than drilling facts into memory. But that effort pays dividends not just in exam performance, but in developing the real-world problem-solving skills that universities ultimately aim to cultivate.

Need help perfecting your exam preparation strategy or getting feedback on your academic work? AcademiQuirk is the #1 academic support service in UK and Australia, contact us today.

How much time should I spend organising my materials versus studying content?

Allocate roughly 70% of your preparation time to studying for deep understanding and 30% to organising materials. Most students benefit from creating their organisation system 3-4 days before the exam, after completing primary study.

Can I bring materials to look up everything during an open-book exam?

Technically yes if permitted, but practically no. Time constraints prevent extensive lookups. If you’re learning information during the exam rather than verifying it, you won’t finish. Research shows students who rely heavily on materials during exams consistently score lower than those who use them selectively for supporting evidence.

Are digital notes better than printed materials for open-book exams?

This depends on exam format and personal preference. For online remote exams, digital notes with well-structured folders and searchable PDFs offer advantages. For in-person exams, many students find physical materials faster to navigate, particularly with colour-coded tabs and annotations. It’s best to test both approaches during practice sessions.

Should I write practice answers before the exam?

No. Pre-written answers rarely address actual questions and waste preparation time. Instead, practice the thinking process: read sample questions, identify what they’re asking, outline how you’d structure responses, and note which materials you’d reference. This builds flexible problem-solving skills rather than rigid memorisation.

Do open-book exams affect final grades compared to traditional exams?

Research shows mixed results depending on discipline and question design. Some studies report 6-8% higher scores with the open-book format, whilst others show no significant difference when questions test higher-order thinking. The format itself matters less than whether your preparation matches what’s being assessed.

Author

Dr Grace Alexander

Share on